Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zachary Le Freeman's avatar

Hi Bo, it is Zac here from the Vietnamese Catan Club - HeXSaiGon. Overall, your article is very well thought, deeply analysed, and worth reading. I personally agree with you on most of your arguments except for one. From my own experience, I would say there is luck involved in table talk & trading. Since each player possesses a unique trait and sense of logic, that factor might affect the outcome of a trade or a block in one way or another.

For instance, it is widely accepted that we should never conduct a trade with the leading player; however, a few people, myself included, would still cross that line as long as the benefits outweigh the risk to a high enough extent. Says at the moment I only have 6 VPs and the leader has 8, if trading with them helps me raise my VPs to 8 while it is guaranteed there is no way they can go beyond 9 VPs in their turn which is next, it is likely that I will go ahead and do it.

Making another example, when a player is controlling the robber, sometimes it is nigh impossible to persuade them out of their perception on who is currently the strongest. Some people stick to the number of total VPs, while others will lean towards productive points. It is not easy to tell who is actually in the lead between a player with 5 settlements and the Longest Road, versus one with 3 cities.

There will always be players who would hold the grudge against you for the entire game if you block their road, although I would not. Some people will trade you 4 throwaway cards to get 1 crucial resource without hesitation, while others will never agree on a deal higher than 2 for 1. In a nutshell, I suggest that the characteristics of opposing players shall be counted as an uncontrollable factor that could hinder or help anyone in the game, thus taking away 5% of the skill and adding to the luck.

Expand full comment